Folks:
Like many True Sustainability participants, I have been involved in sustainable design, energy and environment since the 1970s. I also had a hand in rewording the AIA COTE Top Ten principles in the 1990s. I am now involved in concepts of "Resilient Design." "Resilience" is different and distinct from our prior conceptions because it is incorporating lessons learned, knowledge and vary rapidly emerging tools and methods from the natural disaster mitigation disciplines. These disciplines like ours have a 20 to 30 year history, evident in conferences sponsored by the Natural Hazards Center, U.Colorado, (among many others worldwide). Resilience is an equally strong and important thread to our increasingly multidisciplinary professions and practices. It is not merely an extension of sustainability. It is a critical enrichment and on some points overriding set of principles, with some terms, methods, and practices that are entirely new to the sustainability forum. If sustainability practitioners do not understand the special issues of disaster preparedness, we will not qualify for a seat at the table. Or more specifically: if we as planners, designers and built environment professionals do not fully engage the issues of resilience and disaster preparedness and bring these to bear in the public realm of policy and action, then our future cities and environments will be determined by the incidents and accidents of the natural disasters they experience, not the hand and mind of the designer and builder. The state of art of work in resilience is very dynamic and dramatic. Its emergence reminds me almost exactly of the early 1970s when so many of us stayed up day and night enlivened by what we then called "energy conscious design" and "environmentally responsible design," those clumsy phrases now reduced to practice in green building, LEED, and other topics so well articulated on the TrueSustainability website. But there should be a seperate topic definition for the special and new considerations of resilience and preparedness, not to exclude the others, but to give focus on what for many of the green community will be entirely new insights, experiences and ways of working. Otherwise I will have to look elsewhere for leading edge discussion of design for the 21st century.
Donald Watson, FAIA
Comment by James L. Binkley on November 13, 2011 at 8:34am Don,
I completely agree.
Let me know how I can continue to support you, Dan Williams and others.
Sincerely,
Jim
James Binkley, FAIA
Comment
Welcome to the True Sustainability community, a forum in which to share transformative regional and cutting edge projects that redefine the relationship between sites, buildings and their larger environment. We invite you to engage with this community to learn from each other’s successes and challenges, and to reach out to others within the site to form innovative regional partnerships.
Read More >

A few years ago, members of the American Institute of Architects Committee on the Environment (AIA COTE) Advisory Group began discussions on the fact that greening of the built environment was concerned with increasing efficiencies of systems and the use of materials and not larger concerns. It seemed that little effort was invested in a holistic response to the vital issues of our times including – ecological degradation on an unprecedented scale, climate change, loss of systems that provide food and water and peak energy.
Read More >

© 2012 Created by Prisca Weems.

You need to be a member of True Sustainability to add comments!
Join True Sustainability